![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLZjQ0Zji4pytDba_WSv9f8oKg2eTlJvAdoLzKGaBytamYM8HXtSGq98b5rGHCj7IqunGeEs3gT3PruQpMOIXPIQ1f2gcPoeEIq3lQlkvotNKe60m7bFGc2pZAJMyvow0xuxDk/s320/LULAC+logo.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiqdD0dW_Ho1978ZDObDXf52nWqPUxFFKgLS_JbBCzxxhLYm3Ofm9z8S0vDC3YJgQEQ17Thwo4a84_14OdKG6wGoiRELJqwMPW34jTvS9WDq95Qw-uUQY0W3D7Lq2sLlS3WHxuT/s320/Dem-logo.gif)
The Texas Democratic Party was sued Friday by Latino advocacy groups that contend the complicated primary and caucus system used in the March 4 presidential primary unfairly diluted Latino votes.
The League of United Latin American Citizens of Texas and the Mexican American Bar Association of Houston sued in federal court, arguing the party failed to seek clearance required by the U.S. Justice Department for the so-called "Texas Two Step." The groups also argue the system effectively discriminates against Latino voters by giving them fewer delegates.
Texas Democrats distribute the state's 193 delegates using both a primary election and a caucus, but the distribution favors state Senate districts that had high voter turnout in the last presidential and gubernatorial elections.
In the March 4 election, that meant predominantly Hispanic districts, where turnout was low in 2004 and 2006, got fewer delegates than others, particularly urban, predominantly black districts. Latino districts favored Hillary Clinton; black districts favored Barack Obama.
"The manner used to allocate the delegates ... undervalues Latino Democratic voters and does not provide Latino voters with an equal opportunity to participate in the nominating process and to elect candidates of their choice," the lawsuit says.
Is it just me, or is Lulac sue-happy?
ReplyDelete