~One would think that with all the money these banks are making that they would have some adequate security in place to counter these types of crimes.
I guess they are too busy charging their customers and paying themselves bonuses to actually put some serious security measures into place. Even the 99p, equivalent to the US $1 dollar stores have security guards in the UK.
You would think that these banks who are raking in cash would have proper security measures in place.
Exactly. Notice the increase in bank robberies since banks got rid of their armed security guards. It's like taking candy from a baby nowdays. You don't even need a gun.
People don't need a gun to rob a bank because they probably have cooperation from the inside already, a pre-planned "incident".
Anyway, here in the UK, there was a man who consistently robbed the same bank around the same time at Christmas for three years in a row. It was a Lloyds TSB in Tottenham Court Road in London, but conveniently the police did not manage to catch this guy for three years in a row despite pictures of him on CCTV camera.
Smells like an inside job, besides most of these so called banks and organisations can write-off the losses due to robbery and theft on their tax return or claim on their insurance, so they never really lose do they?
But the customers just get charged more in fees, as everybody knows.
~One would think that with all the money these banks are making that they would have some adequate security in place to counter these types of crimes.
ReplyDeleteI guess they are too busy charging their customers and paying themselves bonuses to actually put some serious security measures into place. Even the 99p, equivalent to the US $1 dollar stores have security guards in the UK.
You would think that these banks who are raking in cash would have proper security measures in place.
It's all about priorities at the end of the day.
I thought about this a bit more, besides, these banks can always claim it on their insurance, assuming it wasn't an inside job, of course.
ReplyDeleteExactly. Notice the increase in bank robberies since banks got rid of their armed security guards. It's like taking candy from a baby nowdays. You don't even need a gun.
ReplyDeletePeople don't need a gun to rob a bank because they probably have cooperation from the inside already, a pre-planned "incident".
ReplyDeleteAnyway, here in the UK, there was a man who consistently robbed the same bank around the same time at Christmas for three years in a row. It was a Lloyds TSB in Tottenham Court Road in London, but conveniently the police did not manage to catch this guy for three years in a row despite pictures of him on CCTV camera.
Smells like an inside job, besides most of these so called banks and organisations can write-off the losses due to robbery and theft on their tax return or claim on their insurance, so they never really lose do they?
But the customers just get charged more in fees, as everybody knows.